Scorecard

Results, with labels

Numbers here are produced by the code at the current commit. Read the status column before the agreement column.

87

quantities benchmarked against published data by scripts/benchmark_predictions.py. 51 are numeric comparisons; 36 are bounds or structural statements.

51 / 51

numeric comparisons within 2σ or the stated tolerance. This includes many results that standard physics also predicts.

7

predictions the project classes as genuinely unique to BPR, meaning standard physics makes no prediction or a different one.

1,655

tests passing in the repository as of September 2026. A passing test suite checks internal consistency, not truth.

Status labels

derived from p and z with no adjustable coefficient. framework BPR formula, at least one fitted coefficient or experimental input. consistent matches, but so does standard physics. conjectural reproduces a number without a derivation. input taken from experiment.

Couplings and mixing

QuantityBPRMeasuredGapStatus
1/α (fine-structure)137.039137.0360.002%derived p anchored here
sin²θW at MZ0.23120.2312<0.01%framework 3/8 at unification, run down with SM RGEs
sin²θ12 (solar)0.30860.3092 ± 0.00870.1σframework coefficient 3.5 fitted
θ23 (atmospheric)49.3°~49° ± 1.3°0.2σframework coefficient 1.35 fitted
θ13 (reactor)8.64°8.54° ± 0.15°0.7σderived uses ngen input
CKM θ12 (Cabibbo)12.97°13.04°0.5%conjectural from flavor labels
CKM θ232.32°2.38°2.5%conjectural
CKM θ130.202°0.201°0.5%conjectural uses ℓt = 283
CKM δCP68.5°68.5° ± 5.7°0.0σderived π/2 − 1/√(z+1)
Jarlskog J2.9 × 10⁻⁵3.1 × 10⁻⁵6.5%conjectural

Masses

QuantityBPRReferenceGapStatus
me0.5104 MeV0.5110 MeV0.11%conjectural labels (1, √210, 59), τ anchor
mμ107.2 MeV105.66 MeV1.45%conjectural documented tension
mu2.16 MeV2.16 MeV0.1%conjectural ℓ = 1/283 of top
mc1242 MeV1270 ± 20 MeV1.4σconjectural
ms93.5 MeV93.4 MeV0.1%conjectural
mt = vEW/√2174.1 GeV172.5–173.7 GeVscheme dependentframework vEW input; pole vs MC mass
Σ mν0.060 eV< 0.12 eVboundderived
Neutrino orderingnormalslight preferenceopenderived from p ≡ 1 mod 4
Koide parameter Q2/30.66666—consistent asserted, not derived; mechanism withdrawn with the ℓ = 1 argument

Quark references are quoted at different scales (u, d, s at MS-bar 2 GeV; c and b at their own mass scales; t as a pole-mass reference). Comparisons across them need a stated scheme, which the current code does not enforce.

Cosmology and gravity

QuantityBPRMeasuredGapStatus
Dark energy w₀ today−1.000−0.827 ± 0.060 (DESI DR1)2.9σderived tension; falsifier if w₀ > −0.80 holds
Baryon asymmetry η6.2 × 10⁻¹⁰6.14 × 10⁻¹⁰0.4σframework
ΩDM h²0.110.120~10%framework
MOND scale a₀1.04 × 10⁻¹⁰ m/s²1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰13%framework
Gravitational wave speedc|v − c|/c < 10⁻¹⁵—consistent
Post-Newtonian seriesGR exactlyGR—consistent corrections ~ (ℓP/r)²

Genuinely unique predictions

These are the places where BPR says something the Standard Model and general relativity do not. They are the results worth testing.

PredictionBPRStandard physics
Neutrino mass orderingNormalEither allowed
Neutrino natureDirac; no neutrinoless double beta decayMajorana allowed
Casimir exponent δ2No correction
Born rule deviation κ~10⁻⁵Exact
Lorentz violation |δc/c|~3 × 10⁻²¹Zero
ms/md20.0 (conjectural labels)No prediction
Z′ at 511 GeV from b → s structureδC₉ ≈ −0.97No anomaly expected

What is not on this page

  • Strong-force spectrum. None. The 1.0 glueball sector failed a blind benchmark; the 2.0 proposal has no spectrum yet. See status.
  • The 1.0 "24 theories" scope. Earlier versions of this site listed biological, neural, and fluid-dynamics results alongside particle physics. Those are retained in the repository as consistent checks of scaling exponents, mostly reproducing standard results, and are catalogued on The Well page. They are not evidence for BPR's particle-physics claims.
  • Percent-confidence dashboards. Earlier versions displayed "mean confidence 97%". That number had no defined meaning and has been removed.

Source of record: VALIDATION_STATUS.md and BENCHMARK_SCORECARD.md.